Comments for ser's home page

Comment on Eclipse – GMF – Making Figures Sensitive To Attributes Of Semantic Elements by PearlieANDREWS

PearlieANDREWS — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 01:40:41 +0000

One admits that humen's life is very expensive, nevertheless different people need money for various stuff and not every person gets big sums cash. Therefore to get good loan and just short term loan would be a correct way out.

Comment on How To Enable UUID In EMF Generated Model To Get Copy&Paste Working by Seweryn Niemiec

Seweryn Niemiec — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:42:50 +0000

I don’t know. Try to ask on GMF forum http://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php?t=thread&frm_id=16

Comment on How To Enable UUID In EMF Generated Model To Get Copy&Paste Working by Sairam Meghi

Sairam Meghi — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:53:42 +0000

How to disable copy and paste from the editor?? Please let me know

Comment on How To Enable UUID In EMF Generated Model To Get Copy&Paste Working by Sairam Meghi

Sairam Meghi — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:36:15 +0000

I am able to copy and paste the elements in a compartment, however when i am copying the element which has compartment i am facing serious problems.

Comment on Eclipse – GMF – Making Figures Sensitive To Attributes Of Semantic Elements by software development

software development — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:25:33 +0000

Quite inspiring,

This is some great advice, thanks for sharing,

Anyway, thanks for the post

Comment on Eclipse – GMF – Making Figures Sensitive To Attributes Of Semantic Elements by Ramon

Ramon — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:40:38 +0000

I’ve used these code snippets with success… But, when saving a diagram and reloading it again the figure is drawn on the canvas without the ‘modifications’ as specified in the updateFace() method, although the updateFace() method is called from the constructor of the figure… Do you experience the same problem as I’m describing here? Do know what the problem might be?

Comment on How To Enable UUID In EMF Generated Model To Get Copy&Paste Working by KTB

KTB — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:06:01 +0000

Hello, thx for your post. It helped me a lot :)

Comment on Java version of gstpw by Seweryn Niemiec

Seweryn Niemiec — Mon, 26 May 2008 12:38:21 +0000

source code is public and is available on gstpw’s project page: http://code.google.com/p/gstpw/

Comment on Java version of gstpw by GalaxyWarrior

GalaxyWarrior — Fri, 23 May 2008 09:26:21 +0000

Hi, i like this Stopwatch and would ask if the Java Sources are public or not. I tried to create a Stopwatch but it does not work good.

Comment on Java Generics: Instantiating Objects Of Type Parameter Without Passing Class Literal To Instance by Seweryn Niemiec

Seweryn Niemiec — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:07:55 +0000

thx for all comments.
btw, I have fixed some formatting issues which arouse with new web template.

Comment on gstpw – a simple stopwatch program by Marco van der Grient

Marco van der Grient — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:05:18 +0000

Hi,
Thanks a lot for the stopwatch, I was looking for it a long time now. And I am to dum to write one…
So u have one user here… If it only could signal at a giving time! But hey…
Thanks again man.

Comment on Java Generics: Instantiating Objects Of Type Parameter Without Passing Class Literal To Instance by Alex Miller

Alex Miller — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:53:04 +0000

Yeah, reified generics hopefully will be part of Java 7 – see http://tech.puredanger.com/java7#reified for some more info.

Comment on Java Generics: Instantiating Objects Of Type Parameter Without Passing Class Literal To Instance by Seweryn Niemiec

Seweryn Niemiec — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:30:11 +0000

We have to wait for Java 7 for that.

Comment on Java Generics: Instantiating Objects Of Type Parameter Without Passing Class Literal To Instance by Sam

Sam — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:40:22 +0000

You should really be able to do T.getClass()

Comment on Java Generics: Instantiating Objects Of Type Parameter Without Passing Class Literal To Instance by Ricky Clarkson

Ricky Clarkson — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:10:29 +0000

A better way is to require a general Factory, which is what a Constructor would be if it wasn’t so tightly bound to the implementation of objects/classes in Java.

Then you just take a generic Factory, and call newInstance.

public [T] void doSomething(Factory[T] factory)
{
T t=factory.newInstance();
t.stuff();
}

I used [] to avoid HTML swallowing, as there’s no Preview button.